However, I must here make one observation.
When Napoleon dictated or related to his friends in St.Helena the facts which they have reported he was out of the world,--he had played his part.

Fortune, which, according to his notions, had conferred on him all his power and greatness, had recalled all her gifts before he sank into the tomb.

His ruling passion would induce him to think that it was due to his glory to clear up certain facts which might prove an unfavourable escort if they accompanied him to posterity.

This was his fixed idea.
But is there not some ground for suspecting the fidelity of him who writes or dictates his own history?
Why might he not impose on a few persons in St.Helena, when he was able to impose on France and Europe, respecting many acts which emanated from him during the long duration of his power?
The life of Napoleon would be very unfaithfully written were the author to adopt as true all his bulletins and proclamations, and all the declarations he made at St.Helena.Such a history would frequently be in contradiction to facts; and such only is that which might be entitled, 'The History of Napoleon, written by Himself'.
I have said thus much because it is my wish that the principles which have guided me in the composition of these Memoirs may be understood.
I am aware that they will not please every reader; that is a success to which I cannot pretend.

Some merit, however, may be allowed me on account of the labour I have undergone.