[The Fathers of the Constitution by Max Farrand]@TWC D-Link book
The Fathers of the Constitution

CHAPTER VII
6/19

To reconcile the conflicting interests of the two sections a compromise was finally reached.

The requirement of a two-thirds vote of both houses for the passing of navigation acts which the Southern members had obtained was abandoned, and on the other hand it was determined that Congress should not be allowed to interfere with the importation of slaves for twenty years.

This, again, was one of the important and conspicuous compromises of the Constitution.

It is liable, however, to be misunderstood, for one should not read into the sentiment of the members of the Convention any of the later strong prejudice against slavery.

There were some who objected on moral grounds to the recognition of slavery in the Constitution, and that word was carefully avoided by referring to "such Persons as any States now existing shall think proper to admit." And there were some who were especially opposed to the encouragement of that institution by permitting the slave trade, but the majority of the delegates regarded slavery as an accepted institution, as a part of the established order, and public sentiment on the slave trade was not much more emphatic and positive than it is now on cruelty to animals.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books