[The Fathers of the Constitution by Max Farrand]@TWC D-Link book
The Fathers of the Constitution

CHAPTER VI
14/17

The members were evidently afraid of the impression which would be created outside, if it were suspected that there were dissensions in the Convention, and the motion was not put to a vote.
How far physical conditions may influence men in adopting any particular course of action it is impossible to say.

But just when the discussion in the Convention reached a critical stage, just when the compromise presented by the committee was ready for adoption or rejection, the weather turned from unpleasantly hot to being comfortably cool.

And, after some little time spent in the consideration Of details, on the 16th of July, the great compromise of the Constitution was adopted.
There was no other that compared with it in importance.

Its most significant features were that in the upper house each State should have an equal vote and that in the lower house representation should be apportioned on the basis of population, while direct taxation should follow the same proportion.

The further proviso that money bills should originate in the lower house and should not be amended in the upper house was regarded by some delegates as of considerable importance, though others did not think so, and eventually the restriction upon amendment by the upper house was dropped.
There has long been a prevailing belief that an essential feature of the great compromise was the counting of only three-fifths of the slaves in enumerating the population.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books