[The Fathers of the Constitution by Max Farrand]@TWC D-Link bookThe Fathers of the Constitution CHAPTER V 20/27
Retaliation was the dominating idea in the foreign policy of the time.
So in 1784 Congress made a new recommendation to the States, prefacing it with an assertion of the importance of commerce, saying: "The fortune of every Citizen is interested in the success thereof; for it is the constant source of wealth and incentive to industry; and the value of our produce and our land must ever rise or fall in proportion to the prosperous or adverse state of trade." And after declaring that Great Britain had "adopted regulations destructive of our commerce with her West India Islands," it was further asserted: "Unless the United States in Congress assembled shall be vested with powers competent to the protection of commerce, they can never command reciprocal advantages in trade." It was therefore proposed to give to Congress for fifteen years the power to prohibit the importation or exportation of goods at American ports except in vessels owned by the people of the United States or by the subjects of foreign governments having treaties of commerce with the United States.
This was simply a request for authorization to adopt navigation acts.
But the individual States were too much concerned with their own interests and did not or would not appreciate the rights of the other States or the interests of the Union as a whole.
And so the commercial amendment of 1784 suffered the fate of all other amendments proposed to the Articles of Confederation.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|